Our purpose, our norms and our brand — and what they ask of us.
Agreed by the leadership team across four workshops.
We're not reopening them — we're building on them.
Scan any time. It stays open for the whole session.
menti.com/ale3hvdm31cz
Four workshops, and what came out of them.
Merger pressures, team dynamics, interviews across the function.
Team Diagnostic Survey results, and the purpose they shaped.
How we behave with each other, in our own words.
How we want stakeholders to experience us.
Argued out, in this function, by people in this room.
Two or three members of the leadership team, ninety seconds each.
Three findings. Each one is the reason a different piece exists.
A university call centre. Staff phoned alumni asking for donations.
Five minutes with a student whose scholarship that money had paid for.
more raised, a month later.
The script, the call lists and the people were all the same.
When people can picture who the work is for, the work gets better.
The only question is whether you chose them, or inherited them.
Norms of conduct are part of a team's enabling structure — the design of how a team works. Research on team effectiveness puts more weight on that design than on anything a leader does in the moment.
Amy Edmondson studied nursing units in several hospitals, expecting the best-run teams to make the fewest mistakes.
The better-run units reported more errors — not because they made more, but because it was safe to admit them.
“If you make a mistake here, it won't be held against you.”
Ours are No Surprises! and Respectful Dialogue — and they only work together.
Not what we say about ourselves — what people get from us, every time.
Their Three Steps of Service — a warm welcome using your name, anticipating what you need, and a fond farewell — is the guest's experience.
That is their brand: the standard a guest can count on, wherever they are.
Purpose and norms are ours to set. Brand is theirs to judge.
| The Credo “genuine care and comfort of our guests is our highest mission” | Why we exist | Our purpose |
| The Employee Promise trust, honesty, respect, integrity and commitment — between staff | How we treat each other | Our six norms |
| Three Steps of Service greet by name · anticipate · fond farewell | What the guest experiences | Our brand |
“We are Ladies and Gentlemen serving Ladies and Gentlemen.”
The first half is how they treat each other. The second half is what the guest gets.
One statement that orients and energises the team, and does not change.
Six of them, describing observable behaviour inside the team.
Seven of them, and the people outside decide whether we are getting it right.
A function can be excellent to work in and still be difficult to deal with, and both have to be designed.
We strengthen the health, safety and quality culture, capability and governance of SRLA and its delivery partners so that the community trust us to deliver the project safely. Together, this supports safe delivery and quality outcomes across the program, helping achieve rail day one with safe, reliable infrastructure built to last.
Our direction — it says why our work matters
A partner and advisor, not just a service provider.
Seen and present — and there when they need us.
Guided by clear strategic intent.
We own our decisions and stand behind our quality.
In early, flagging problems before they escalate.
Consistent, competent work backed by expertise.
We ask the right questions and adapt as needs change.
Which of these is about us, and which is about them?
How we work with each other
What people experience of us
Show the other half your line cards
Talk through why they were hard to place
Agree the one card your table most wants answered
Read out your card. Hands up — inside or outside?
We'll give you the answer, and the reason.
Someone inside the team
→ it's a norm
Someone outside the team
→ it's part of our brand
Not one then the other — both are in play in every piece of work, and together they decide how it gets done.
One situation. Every table. Four questions.
It's on the worksheet in front of you.
Listen first — we'll read it to you.
What do our norms require of us here, inside the team?e.g. tell the reviewer the clock is running and agree a date.
What should the delivery partner experience of us here?e.g. one clear answer on the closeout, not silence then a reversal.
What would get in the way, in real conditions?e.g. two audits due the same week, and no owner for the deadline.
One person called out the eleven-day delay and said this is exactly the gap our norms are meant to prevent. The other — who had been reviewing the finding — heard it as being blamed, in front of colleagues, for a decision made in good faith, with two audits already on their plate.
Both believe they were doing exactly what
Respectful Dialogue asks of them.
What now? One resolution, one post-it.
Every table used the same norms and still landed in different places. Agreeing the words is the easy part. Using them the same way, under pressure, takes practice — and that is why these norms belong to the whole team, not only the leaders who wrote them.
One question. Everyone answers.
What do we want to be true for HSQ in six months that isn't true today?
Scan to answer
menti.com/aluvffpw8re7
In your words, not ours.
This is about where you start — and what you personally think matters most.
Which one norm, or part of our brand, do you think will make the biggest difference to whether HSQ succeeds over the next six months?
Where, specifically, will you practise it in the next fortnight?Name the meeting, the conversation or the decision.